Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought : A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism
12 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: Fr. 34.51 (€ 35.29)¹ (vom 18.10.2017)Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought (2014)
ISBN: 9781317796251 bzw. 131779625X, vermutlich in Englisch, Taylor & Francis Ltd. neu, E-Book.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary, Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom´s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom´s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom´s work are presented and answered. PDF, 03.06.2014.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of ThoughtA Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism
ISBN: 9781138868526 bzw. 1138868523, in Englisch, Routledge, neu.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandoms inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so the recent debate on Brandoms work is addressed extensively and main objections to Brandoms work are presented and answered. Y178719.
Objectivity And The Language-dependence Of Thought: A Transcendental Defence Of Universal Lingualism
ISBN: 9781138868526 bzw. 1138868523, in Englisch, Taylor and Francis, neu.
Christian Barth, Books, Religion and Spirituality, Objectivity And The Language-dependence Of Thought: A Transcendental Defence Of Universal Lingualism, Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom?s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom?s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom?s work are presented and answered.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought : A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism
ISBN: 9781317796251 bzw. 131779625X, in Englisch, Taylor and Francis, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom.Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought
ISBN: 9781138868526 bzw. 1138868523, in Englisch, Taylor & Francis Ltd, neu.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom s work are presented and answered.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought
ISBN: 9780415882699 bzw. 0415882699, in Englisch, Taylor and Francis, neu, E-Book.
Language Arts & Disciplines, Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20 th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom's inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom's work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom's work are presented and answered.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism (Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy) (2010)
ISBN: 9780415882699 bzw. 0415882699, in Englisch, 258 Seiten, Routledge, gebundenes Buch, gebraucht, Erstausgabe.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, harvestbooks.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered., Hardcover, Ausgabe: 1, Label: Routledge, Routledge, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2010-07-29, Studio: Routledge, Verkaufsrang: 8163398.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism (Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy) (2010)
ISBN: 9780415882699 bzw. 0415882699, in Englisch, 258 Seiten, Routledge, gebundenes Buch, neu, Erstausgabe.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.com.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered., Hardcover, Ausgabe: 1, Label: Routledge, Routledge, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2010-07-29, Studio: Routledge, Verkaufsrang: 8163398.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism (Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy) (2010)
ISBN: 9780415882699 bzw. 0415882699, in Englisch, 258 Seiten, Routledge, gebundenes Buch, neu, Erstausgabe.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Amazon.com.
Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. Barth offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered., Hardcover, Ausgabe: 1, Label: Routledge, Routledge, Produktgruppe: Book, Publiziert: 2010-07-29, Studio: Routledge, Verkaufsrang: 728625.
Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism
ISBN: 9780415882699 bzw. 0415882699, in Englisch, Taylor & Francis, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen