Von dem Buch Citizens Divided (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values) haben wir 3 gleiche oder sehr ähnliche Ausgaben identifiziert!
Falls Sie nur an einem bestimmten Exempar interessiert sind, können Sie aus der folgenden Liste jenes wählen, an dem Sie interessiert sind:
100%: Robert C. Post, Contributor: Pamela S. Karlan, Contributor: Lawrence Lessig, Contributor: Frank I. Michelman, Contributor: Nadia Urbinati: Citizens Divided (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values) (ISBN: 9780674369627) 2014, Harvard University Press, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
100%: Robert C. Post: Citizens Divided (ISBN: 9780674369603) Harvard University Press, United States of America, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
100%: Robert C. Post, Lawrence Lessig: Citizens Divided (ISBN: 9780674369610) 2014, in Englisch, auch als eBook.Nur diese Ausgabe anzeigen…
Citizens Divided (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values)
4 Angebote vergleichen
1
Citizens Divided (2014)
EN NW EBISBN: 9780674369610 bzw. 0674369610, in Englisch, Harvard University Press, neu, E-Book.
Lieferung aus: Niederlande, Direct beschikbaar.
bol.com.
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps.Post interprets constitutional conflict ... The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps.Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech.Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity. Productinformatie:Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 0x0 mm;Gewicht: 0,00 gram;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers te koop bij bol.com (of compatible met Adobe DRM). Telefoons/tablets met Google Android (1.6 of hoger) voorzien van bol.com boekenbol app. PC en Mac met Adobe reader software;ISBN10: 0674369610;ISBN13: 9780674369610; Engels | Ebook | 2014.
bol.com.
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps.Post interprets constitutional conflict ... The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps.Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech.Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity. Productinformatie:Taal: Engels;Afmetingen: 0x0 mm;Gewicht: 0,00 gram;Formaat: ePub met kopieerbeveiliging (DRM) van Adobe;Kopieerrechten: Het kopiëren van (delen van) de pagina's is niet toegestaan ;Geschikt voor: Alle e-readers te koop bij bol.com (of compatible met Adobe DRM). Telefoons/tablets met Google Android (1.6 of hoger) voorzien van bol.com boekenbol app. PC en Mac met Adobe reader software;ISBN10: 0674369610;ISBN13: 9780674369610; Engels | Ebook | 2014.
2
Robert C. Post, Contributor: Pamela S. Karlan, Contributor: Lawrence Lessig, Contributor: Frank I. Michelman, Contributor: Nadia Urbinati
Citizens Divided (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values) (2014)
EN NW RP EB DLISBN: 9780674369627 bzw. 0674369629, in Englisch, 265 Seiten, Harvard University Press, neu, Nachdruck, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, ebook for download, Free shipping.
First Amendment defenders greeted the Court's Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps, and he explains how the case might have been decided in a way that would preserve free speech and electoral integrity. Kindle Edition, Edition: Reprint, Format: Kindle eBook, Label: Harvard University Press, Harvard University Press, Product group: eBooks, Published: 2014-06-23, Release date: 2014-06-23, Studio: Harvard University Press, Sales rank: 1064273.
First Amendment defenders greeted the Court's Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps, and he explains how the case might have been decided in a way that would preserve free speech and electoral integrity. Kindle Edition, Edition: Reprint, Format: Kindle eBook, Label: Harvard University Press, Harvard University Press, Product group: eBooks, Published: 2014-06-23, Release date: 2014-06-23, Studio: Harvard University Press, Sales rank: 1064273.
3
Citizens Divided (2014)
EN NW EB DLISBN: 9780674369610 bzw. 0674369610, in Englisch, Harvard University Press, Harvard University Press, Harvard University Press, neu, E-Book, elektronischer Download.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, in-stock.
First Amendment defenders greeted the Court's Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps, and he explains how the case might have been decided in a way that would preserve free speech and electoral integrity.
First Amendment defenders greeted the Court's Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps, and he explains how the case might have been decided in a way that would preserve free speech and electoral integrity.
Lade…