U.S. Policy in Asia: In Search for a Strategy Author
16 Angebote vergleichen

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, sofort lieferbar.
With the inauguration of the 44th U.S. President ahead in January 2009, it is not surprising that 2008 has been a year full of proposals, how the U.S.-Asia policy of the next administration should look like. Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has lost its role as the decisive strategic actor in the Asian region. It is now sharing the stage with China which has grown dramatically over the past 20 years. There has also been a considerable process of regionalization in Asia, documented best in the success of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the ongoing ASEAN plus three process that includes China, Japan and South Korea. Being aware that the balance of power is shifting not in favour of the United States, there are several concepts, how the next U.S. administration should handle the situation in Asia. A realist concept in which the rise of China is considered to be a great danger to vital U.S. interests in the region suggests a policy of balancing against China. That m.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, E-Book zum Download.
With the inauguration of the 44th U.S. President ahead in January 2009, it is not surprising that 2008 has been a year full of proposals, how the U.S.-Asia policy of the next administration should look like. Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has lost its role as the decisive strategic actor in the Asian region. It is now sharing the stage with China which has grown dramatically over the past 20 years. There has also been a considerable process of regionalization in Asia, documented best in the success of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the ongoing ASEAN plus three process that includes China, Japan and South Korea. Being aware that the balance of power is shifting not in favour of the United States, there are several concepts, how the next U.S. administration should handle the situation in Asia. A realist concept - in which the rise of China is considered to be a great danger to vital U.S. interests in the region - suggests a policy of balancing against China. That means shaping the balance of power in favour of American interests. In contrast, an institutional concept pledges for a more cooperative, forward-looking policy towards China and Asia as a whole, saying that such cooperation would serve Asian (including Chinese) as well as American interests. In the following section I will show the concept of a forward-looking U.S.-Asia policy represented by Wu Xinbo (2008, 155-163). I will also put it in the context of IR theory and will compare it with other approaches.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
U.S. Policy in Asia: In Search for a Strategy: Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Far East, grade: 1,3, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, language: English, abstract: With the inauguration of the 44th U.S. President ahead in January 2009, it is not surprising that 2008 has been a year full of proposals, how the U.S.-Asia policy of the next administration should look like. Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has lost its role as the decisive strategic actor in the Asian region. It is now sharing the stage with China which has grown dramatically over the past 20 years. There has also been a considerable process of regionalization in Asia, documented best in the success of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the ongoing ASEAN plus three process that includes China, Japan and South Korea. Being aware that the balance of power is shifting not in favour of the United States, there are several concepts, how the next U.S. administration should handle the situation in Asia. A realist concept - in which the rise of China is considered to be a great danger to vital U.S. interests in the region - suggests a policy of balancing against China. That means shaping the balance of power in favour of American interests. In contrast, an institutional concept pledges for a more cooperative, forward-looking policy towards China and Asia as a whole, saying that such cooperation would serve Asian (including Chinese) as well as American interests. In the following section I will show the concept of a forward-looking U.S.-Asia policy represented by Wu Xinbo (2008, 155-163). I will also put it in the context of IR theory and will compare it with other approaches. Englisch, Ebook.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Far East, grade: 1,3, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, language: English, abstract: With the inauguration of the 44th U.S. President ahead in January 2009, it is not surprising that 2008 has been a year full of proposals, how the U.S.-Asia policy of the next administration should look like. Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has lost its role as the decisive strategic actor in the Asian region. It is now sharing the stage with China which has grown dramatically over the past 20 years. There has also been a considerable process of regionalization in Asia, documented best in the success of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the ongoing ASEAN plus three process that includes China, Japan and South Korea. Being aware that the balance of power is shifting not in favour of the United States, there are several concepts, how the next U.S. administration should handle the situation in Asia. A realist concept - in which the rise of China is considered to be a great danger to vital U.S. interests in the region - suggests a policy of balancing against China. That means shaping the balance of power in favour of American interests. In contrast, an institutional concept pledges for a more cooperative, forward-looking policy towards China and Asia as a whole, saying that such cooperation would serve Asian (including Chinese) as well as American interests. In the following section I will show the concept of a forward-looking U.S.-Asia policy represented by Wu Xinbo (2008, 155-163). I will also put it in the context of IR theory and will compare it with other approaches.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, E-Book zum Download.
After its devastating defeat in World War II, Japan has become one of the major economic powers in the world, ending the twentieth century as the worlds second largest economy. Although Japan has grown to economic great-power status, its political weight in international politics lags far behind. Why is that? During the Cold War, Japan linked itself closely to the United States as the ***nt regional force in East Asia. By renouncing war and the possibility to become a major military power again, Japan laid its national security almost fully in the hands of the United States. Japans dependence on U.S. power marginalized its role in world affairs. On the other hand, however, the security guaranteed by the United States provided the basis for Japans economic rise. Since the end of the Cold War, the parameters of the U.S.-Japan alliance have been called into question. Japans post-war foreign policy - known as Yoshida Consensus - which rejected the use of military might to achieve political ends and contained several self-imposed restrictions on the use of military has been softened more and more. A development that has been documented best in the deployment of Japan Self Defense Forces (JSDF) in Iraq by the Koizumi administration. Although the U.S.-Japan alliance is arguably stronger than ever before, the role of Japan within it is probably less secure than ever before. To understand this, it is necessary to analyze the circumstances which motivated Japan to change its long-time security approach. Indeed, the Asian region has changed dramatically since the end of the Cold War. Japan is now facing several new challenges, mostly important the rise of China, that havent played a role during the era of the iron curtain. Do those challenges require new policies? Is there a new Consensus about Japans foreign policy? What will be Japans strategy for the twenty-first century? Those are the questions this paper is about. The paper is separated into three parts. First, I will analyze the factors by which Japans foreign policy is determined. A step that is crucial to understand possible future security options. In the second section I will present different security options, Japan has in the future. Finally, I will sum up some of the results and will present a few of my own thoughts about Japans future.

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, sofort lieferbar.
After its devastating defeat in World War II, Japan has become one of the major economic powers in the world, ending the twentieth century as the worlds second largest economy. Although Japan has grown to economic great-power status, its political weight in international politics lags far behind. Why is that? During the Cold War, Japan linked itself closely to the United States as the ***nt regional force in East Asia. By renouncing war and the possibility to become a major military power again, Japan laid its national security almost fully in the hands of the United States. Japans dependence on U.S. power marginalized its role in world affairs. On the other hand, however, the security guaranteed by the United States provided the basis for Japans economic rise. Since the end of the Cold War, the parameters of the U.S.-Japan alliance have been called into question. Japans post-war foreign policy known as Yoshida Consensus which rejected the use of military might to achieve political ends and cont.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Far East, grade: 2,3, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: East Asia in World Affairs, language: English, abstract: After its devastating defeat in World War II, Japan has become one of the major economic powers in the world, ending the twentieth century as the world's second largest economy. Although Japan has grown to economic great-power status, its political weight in international politics lags far behind. Why is that? During the Cold War, Japan linked itself closely to the United States as the dominant regional force in East Asia. By renouncing war and the possibility to become a major military power again, Japan laid its national security almost fully in the hands of the United States. Japan's dependence on U.S. power marginalized its role in world affairs. On the other hand, however, the security guaranteed by the United States provided the basis for Japan's economic rise. Since the end of the Cold War, the parameters of the U.S.-Japan alliance have been called into question. Japan's post-war foreign policy - known as 'Yoshida Consensus' - which rejected the use of military might to achieve political ends and contained several self-imposed restrictions on the use of military has been softened more and more. A development that has been documented best in the deployment of Japan Self Defense Forces (JSDF) in Iraq by the Koizumi administration. Although the U.S.-Japan alliance is arguably stronger than ever before, the role of Japan within it is probably less secure than ever before. To understand this, it is necessary to analyze the circumstances which motivated Japan to change its long-time security approach. Indeed, the Asian region has changed dramatically since the end of the Cold War. Japan is now facing several new challenges, mostly important the rise of China, that haven't played a role during the era of the iron curtain. Do those challenges require new policies? Is there a 'new' Consensus about Japan's foreign policy? What will be Japan's strategy for the twenty-first century? Those are the questions this paper is about. The paper is separated into three parts. First, I will analyze the factors by which Japan's foreign policy is determined. A step that is crucial to understand possible future security options. In the second section I will present different security options, Japan has in the future. Finally, I will sum up some of the results and will present a few of my own thoughts about Japan's future.

Lieferung aus: Australien, in-stock.
Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Far East, grade: 1,3, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, language: English, abstract: With the inauguration of the 44th U.S. President ahead in January 2.

Lieferung aus: Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika, Lagernd.
US-Policy-in-Asia~~Martin-Armbruster, U.S. Policy in Asia: In Search for a Strategy, NOOK Book (eBook).

Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen