'Human Rights Imperialism' or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989?: A Discussion of Francis Fukuyama's Arguments
8 Angebote vergleichen
Bester Preis: Fr. 13.65 (€ 13.99)¹ (vom 01.09.2016)1
Human Rights Imperialism' or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989?
DE PB NW
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, in Deutsch, Grin Verlag, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkosten nach: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama's theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 'Clash of Civilizations', in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama's concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of "a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course". I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today's salience of Fukuyama's argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define 'revolution' in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered 'revolutions', if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term 'revolution' necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, "a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West" as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the "universalization of Western liberal democracy" . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, "the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe" : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China's authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America's role in the world remains at best ambiguous. 2016. 20 S. 210 mm Versandfertig in 3-5 Tagen, Softcover, Neuware.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama's theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 'Clash of Civilizations', in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama's concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of "a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course". I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today's salience of Fukuyama's argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define 'revolution' in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered 'revolutions', if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term 'revolution' necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, "a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West" as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the "universalization of Western liberal democracy" . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, "the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe" : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China's authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America's role in the world remains at best ambiguous. 2016. 20 S. 210 mm Versandfertig in 3-5 Tagen, Softcover, Neuware.
2
Human Rights Imperialism' or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989? (1989)
~EN PB NW
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, vermutlich in Englisch, Grin Verlag, Taschenbuch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkosten nach: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama's theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 'Clash of Civilizations', in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama's concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of "a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course". I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today's salience of Fukuyama's argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define 'revolution' in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered 'revolutions', if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term 'revolution' necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, "a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West" as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the "universalization of Western liberal democracy" . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, "the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe" : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China's authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America's role in the world remains at best ambiguous. 2016. 20 S. 210 mm Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen, Softcover, Neuware, Offene Rechnung (Vorkasse vorbehalten).
Von Händler/Antiquariat, buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG, [1].
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama's theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 'Clash of Civilizations', in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama's concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of "a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course". I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today's salience of Fukuyama's argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define 'revolution' in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered 'revolutions', if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term 'revolution' necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, "a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West" as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the "universalization of Western liberal democracy" . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, "the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe" : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China's authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America's role in the world remains at best ambiguous. 2016. 20 S. 210 mm Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen, Softcover, Neuware, Offene Rechnung (Vorkasse vorbehalten).
3
Symbolbild
andapos;Human Rights Imperialismandapos; or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989? (2016)
~EN NW RP
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, vermutlich in Englisch, Grin Publishing, neu, Nachdruck.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Books2Anywhere [190245], Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom.
New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
4
Symbolbild
andapos;Human Rights Imperialismandapos; or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989? (2016)
~EN NW RP
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, vermutlich in Englisch, Grin Publishing, neu, Nachdruck.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Paperbackshop-US [8408184], Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
5
´Human Rights Imperialism´ or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989?
DE HC NW
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, in Deutsch, Grin Verlag, gebundenes Buch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandkostenfrei innerhalb von Deutschland.
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama´s theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington´s 1996 ´Clash of Civilizations´, in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama´s concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of ´´a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course´´. I will Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama´s theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington´s 1996 ´Clash of Civilizations´, in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama´s concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of ´´a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course´´. I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today´s salience of Fukuyama´s argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define ´revolution´ in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered ´revolutions´, if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term ´revolution´ necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, ´´a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West´´ as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the ´´universalization of Western liberal democracy´´ . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, ´´the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe´´ : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China´s authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America´s role in the world remains at best ambiguous. Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage.
Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama´s theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington´s 1996 ´Clash of Civilizations´, in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama´s concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of ´´a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course´´. I will Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama´s theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington´s 1996 ´Clash of Civilizations´, in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama´s concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of ´´a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course´´. I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today´s salience of Fukuyama´s argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define ´revolution´ in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered ´revolutions´, if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term ´revolution´ necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, ´´a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West´´ as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the ´´universalization of Western liberal democracy´´ . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, ´´the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe´´ : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China´s authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America´s role in the world remains at best ambiguous. Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage.
6
Symbolbild
Human Rights Imperialism' or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989?:A Discussion of Francis Fukuyama's Arguments (2017)
~EN PB NW RP
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, vermutlich in Englisch, GRIN Publishing, Taschenbuch, neu, Nachdruck.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Ria Christie Collections [59718070], Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Publication Year 2017; Not Signed; Fast Shipping from the UK.
PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Publication Year 2017; Not Signed; Fast Shipping from the UK.
7
'Human Rights Imperialism' or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989?
EN NW
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, in Englisch, neu.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Versandfertig innerhalb von 3 Wochen.
A Discussion of Francis Fukuyama's Arguments, Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama's theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 'Clash of Civilizations', in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama's concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of "a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course". I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today's salience of Fukuyama's argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define 'revolution' in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered 'revolutions', if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term 'revolution' necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, "a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West" as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the "universalization of Western liberal democracy" . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, "the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe" : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China's authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America's role in the world remains at best ambiguous.
A Discussion of Francis Fukuyama's Arguments, Essay from the year 2015 in the subject Cultural Studies - Basics and Definitions, grade: 1,3, Stellenbosch Universitiy, language: English, abstract: After briefly summarizing Fukuyama's theory, the following essay will attempt to compare and contrast several aspects of his work to Samuel P. Huntington's 1996 'Clash of Civilizations', in which he strongly opposes Fukuyama's concept of global homogenization and instead argues in favor of "a multi-polar, civilization-divergent course". I will then continue to show post- 1989 examples that question today's salience of Fukuyama's argument and also comment on the difficulties that we face when trying to define 'revolution' in general, invariant terms. The final question that is open to answer is whether or to what extent those recent events can still be considered 'revolutions', if we assume that History has really ended in 1989. Does the term 'revolution' necessarily imply directedness towards the establishment of liberal democracy, or can revolutions also occur in another direction? If the end of History means an end of revolution, what does that make the social changes that occurred after? With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the defeat of communism in Eastern Europe in 1989, "a round of self-congratulations was sparked in the West" as the Western democracies had successfully won the Cold War which further led to the belief in the "universalization of Western liberal democracy" . 200 years after the Great Revolution in France, inspired by secularized enlightenment, managed to end the absolute monarchy of Louis XVI., and paved the way for more democratic governments all throughout Western Europe, Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of History, as the world had reached its final destination, "the only coherent political aspiration that spans different religions and cultures around the globe" : liberal democracy. Further developments in international relations, such as the rise of terrorism or the economic success of China's authoritarian regime, however, lead to continued discussions about whether liberal democracy can really be considered to be the peak of all civilizations or whether it was simply Western ethnocentrism that led Fukuyama to believe in the superiority of Western values and Western politics. After all, competing ideologies continue to exist today and as the rise in radical anti- Western movements has shown, America's role in the world remains at best ambiguous.
8
'Human Rights Imperialism' or Global Homogenization of Culture? Has the Age of Revolution ended in 1989?: A Discussion of Francis Fukuyama's Arguments (2016)
EN PB NW FE
ISBN: 9783668258709 bzw. 3668258708, in Englisch, 20 Seiten, GRIN Publishing, Taschenbuch, neu, Erstausgabe.
Lieferung aus: Deutschland, Gewöhnlich versandfertig in 2 bis 3 Tagen. Tatsächliche Versandkosten können abweichen.
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Books on Demand GmbH.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Von Händler/Antiquariat, Books on Demand GmbH.
Die Beschreibung dieses Angebotes ist von geringer Qualität oder in einer Fremdsprache. Trotzdem anzeigen
Lade…